FAQs About Affordable Care Act Implementation Part XI
Latest from the Department of Labor...
Friday, January 25, 2013
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Monday, January 14, 2013
Thursday, December 13, 2012
HHS: States can license navigators | LifeHealthPro
Great information. It appears States need to go forward with legislation to create a license for a Navigator. Agents spend years, lots of time and money on education to be an expert. I am concerned that HHS is going to gave Navigators training that is not as comprehensive as what Agents receive to sell in the exchange. Therefore, we have Navigators leading consumers in a direction that may not be best for them. In that the question arises that Agents must carry E&O in the case that someone might receive misinformation, will Navigators be required to carry E&O?
HHS: States can license navigators | LifeHealthPro
HHS: States can license navigators | LifeHealthPro
Monday, December 3, 2012
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Monday, November 12, 2012
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Monday, October 15, 2012
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Romney announces Healthcare Professionals Coalition
Romney for President today announced its Healthcare Professionals for Romney coalition, co-chairs, Cassidy, Boustany, and Fleming
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Monday, October 1, 2012
Alternative to AARP
I didn't think it would take long for a replacement for AARP....... Check out the replacement, AMAC - The Association for Mature American Citizens. www.AMAC.us
So many seniors didn't think AARP had their best interest in mind when they were at the table discussing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
So many seniors didn't think AARP had their best interest in mind when they were at the table discussing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Friday, September 28, 2012
Monday, September 24, 2012
Rep Harry Waxman just doesn't understand
By: Jason Millman – Politico
Posted: September 20, 2012
In the end,
Rep. John Barrow found himself all out on his own.
Barrow
(D-Ga.), the co-sponsor of a bill shielding agent and broker commissions from
the health care law’s medical loss ratio requirement, was the only Democrat on
the House Energy and Commerce Committee who voted to advance the bill Thursday.
The committee approved the bill on a 26-14 vote.
But it’s
likely to have much more Democratic support if it gets to the full House
floor.
The agent and
broker groups say their livelihoods are threatened by the ACA’s limits on what
insurers can spend using premium dollars, besides the actual cost of medical
care. By lumping in broker commissions with insurers’ administrative spending,
the groups say their members have seen their revenue cut between 20 and 50
percent and have suffered job losses as a direct result.
“This doesn’t
just hurt the brokers, but also their employees and, most importantly, the
consumers who rely on them to obtain coverage and assistance in understanding
the complex health care law,” said Robert Smith, president of the National
Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, in a statement.
Agent and
broker groups, framing the MLR as a jobs issue, have made the bill a top
legislative priority over the past two years. They quickly gained support in the
House with 220 co-sponsors, including about two dozen Democrats — more than most
bills altering ACA provisions.
“This should
be a bipartisan bill,” said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), who co-sponsored the
legislation with Barrow.
But the
strongest supporters of the ACA have pushed back hard against the bill,
contending it would weaken one of the law’s strongest consumer protections. The
$1.1 billion in MLR rebates sent out by insurers this year could have been cut
by more than half if agent and broker commissions were exempted from the rule,
Consumers Union claimed in a report yesterday.
“Commissions
have always been recognized as part of administrative costs,” said Henry Waxman
(D-Calif.), the committee’s top Democrat.
“This bill
would reverse this, causing consumers to pay more for coverage or get less in
benefits.”
Democrats on
the committee also criticized a provision of the bill that would let states
determine whether enforcing the MLR would destabilize their individual or
small-group insurance markets.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)